We have become so particularized in surgery as in so numerous other things, that we occasionally reallyaccept as factual that human development proceeds from one tidy little class to the next.
One day we are renowned as "infants." The next, we are in early childhood. Then, possibly pre-pubescence,pursued by adolescence and juvenile adulthood. Then we are "working adults," as are against to other types ofmature individuals who are fortunate sufficient not to have classes of their own. And then, of course, we become "older people" and the "aged."
This is one of those "everything they've been telling you is wrong" articles. It examines as though genes might have rather little to manage with lifespan. A large-scale study of equal twins discovered an mean ten-yeardistinction in lifespan, and no one understands why. The distinction isn't just persons who past away juvenile ofmisfortunes attaching up the stats.
A doctor or a counselor will state, "You understand, your dad is getting on in years. You can anticipatesuch-and-such to occur, and you should arrange your family for this or that other thing to happen." And superficially this sequence of happenings may really happen much as it is described.
We are inclined to accept those propositions because they are orderly and, thus comforting, whereas weunderstand from our own individual, hard know-how that life actually doesn't unfold that neatly. Events fallsin one upon the other. Cause and result is very often a shrewd estimate at best. Other persons and thenatural environment itself will initiate some happenings to happen early and hold up or avert other onesfrom happening at all.
No comments:
Post a Comment